Content:Files: Difference between revisions

→‎Quality: creating a separate section for standalone subs files
(→‎Source: further explaining the look-thru rules of source field)
(→‎Quality: creating a separate section for standalone subs files)
Line 69: Line 69:
This is a very arbitrary field. It depends completely on the eye of the beholder. You should not put too much meaning into it, but rather use it as a general pointer of quality. Possible values are; ''eyecancer, very low, low, med, high, very high.''
This is a very arbitrary field. It depends completely on the eye of the beholder. You should not put too much meaning into it, but rather use it as a general pointer of quality. Possible values are; ''eyecancer, very low, low, med, high, very high.''


'''Also see:''' ''[[Votes:Animegroups]]''<br>
'''Also see:''' ''[[Votes:Animegroups]]''
As a '''general''' guideline, refer to the below for a soft-rule convention that is generally followed.  The below table can be seen as a "default" or "starting point".  If a particular file has sub-par quality, mark down its qualid field relative to the default, as appropriate.  Also note, the historical context of the anime should be kept in mind.  For example. if an anime is released in the 70s, and the highest quality medium of release is LD, it may be appropriate to use the higher range of tehbump the quality field  up a level for the LD release, relative to the defaults below; the goal is to use the qualid field as a differentiator, to identify the LD release as the definitive release relative to other options that may be available (TV, VHS, etc).<br>
<br><br>
'''Note:''' All items highlighted in red below are upscales by definition, as the specifications of the mentioned media do not reach into those resolution ranges.  Items in bold signify the more common qualid (if applicable), where more than 1 is specified.<br>
As a '''general''' guideline, refer to the below for a soft-rule convention that is generally followed.  The below table can be seen as a "default" or "starting point".  If a particular file has sub-par quality, mark down its qualid field relative to the default, as appropriate.  Also note, the historical context of the anime should be kept in mind.  For example. if an anime is released in the 70s, and the highest quality medium of release is LD, it may be appropriate to use the higher range of tehbump the quality field  up a level for the LD release, relative to the defaults below; the goal is to use the qualid field as a differentiator, to identify the LD release as the definitive release relative to other options that may be available (TV, VHS, etc).
<br><br>
'''Note:''' All items highlighted in red below are upscales by definition, as the specifications of the mentioned media do not reach into those resolution ranges.  Items in bold signify the more common qualid (if applicable), where more than 1 is specified.
<br><br>
'''Ultimately, use some discretion and common sense.'''
'''Ultimately, use some discretion and common sense.'''


Line 167: Line 170:
|-
|-
|}
|}
====Quality for standalone subtitle files====


====Description====
====Description====
staff
1,124

edits

MediaWiki spam blocked by CleanTalk.
MediaWiki spam blocked by CleanTalk.