staff
1,124
edits
Groupentries:Status: Difference between revisions
→Animegroup Release Note Comment Examples: added reencodes; added 2nd degree separation notes
(enlarged screenshots) |
(→Animegroup Release Note Comment Examples: added reencodes; added 2nd degree separation notes) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
===Animegroup Release Note Comment Examples=== | ===Animegroup Release Note Comment Examples=== | ||
====Common Cases==== | |||
Below is a non-exhaustive list of common release notes, and how they should be formatted. | Below is a non-exhaustive list of common release notes, and how they should be formatted. | ||
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Subs: [UTW] | <pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Subs: [UTW] | ||
| Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
Subs: [UTW] (track 1, edited, retimed), [FroZen] (track 2, restyled, with [UTW] typesetting), [UTW] (track 3, signs). Raws: R2J (video + JP audio), R1 (EN audio) | Subs: [UTW] (track 1, edited, retimed), [FroZen] (track 2, restyled, with [UTW] typesetting), [UTW] (track 3, signs). Raws: R2J (video + JP audio), R1 (EN audio) | ||
> Common examples of multiple sources being used, with modifications.</pre> | > Common examples of multiple sources being used, with modifications.</pre> | ||
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Subs: [Doki] (modified; [Doki] itself is modified [SS-Eclipse]) | |||
> The group [Tsundere] had used [Soki] subs, which are themselves from [SS-Eclipse]. Currently there is no consensus as to whether the release notes should cite references to the 2nd degree of separation or beyond. Given the lack of consensus, for now this information should be retained where possible.</pre> | |||
====Reencodes with Minor/No Modification==== | |||
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Source: [UTW] | |||
> The file is strictly a reencode of the original [UTW] file.</pre> | |||
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">1) BD Source: [FFF]. www Source: [HorribleSubs] | |||
2) Source: [FFF] (BD), [HorribleSubs] (www) | |||
> Currently, both methods 1) and 2) are acceptable. However, the general consensus is to move towards standard 2), as this is more similar to the other general examples.</pre> | |||
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Subs: [Senketsu Subs]. Raws: [Zero-Raws] (reencoded). | |||
> If a reencode uses multiple sources, then the note becomes similar to a typical non-reencode release, except with the "(reencoded)" note on the "Raw" credit.</pre> | |||
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><<Anything Deadfish, where Deadfish has multiple versions of files with multiple sources>> | |||
> ... ask CDB-Man or Devildoll.</pre> | |||
====Uncommon and Complex Cases==== | |||
Below are a few examples of more complex notes, where the attribution can get complex. | Below are a few examples of more complex notes, where the attribution can get complex. | ||
Please note that when the citations become this complex, there are no strict standards. However, the general formatting of the simpler notes should be followed to the extent possible. | Please note that when the citations become this complex, there are no strict standards. However, the general formatting of the simpler notes should be followed to the extent possible. | ||