Talk:OstDB DEV Foosic: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
:: I don't know whether we'll need encryption. Though just slapping a shared-secret AES encryption ontop of the TCP connection between the matching servers and the matching redirector would probably be very easy to do.
:: I don't know whether we'll need encryption. Though just slapping a shared-secret AES encryption ontop of the TCP connection between the matching servers and the matching redirector would probably be very easy to do.
::[[User:Exp|Exp]] 21:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
::[[User:Exp|Exp]] 21:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
::: i don't see why it should be public. we already have a public interface and that is the UDP API. (the MATCH command doesn't make any sense for external use atm because of the ofid argument, btw). it shouldn't make much difference @ performance either. and the clients would still have to communicate with the udp api to get any useful info. adding a new public service will just lead to more confusion and expose a service that's main function is only for internal usage


=== OLD Stuff ===
=== OLD Stuff ===
546

edits

Navigation menu

MediaWiki spam blocked by CleanTalk.
MediaWiki spam blocked by CleanTalk.