Talk:Shadow Files: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
With worf's suggestion it would be like this:
With worf's suggestion it would be like this:
<div style="width: auto; overflow: hidden;"><div style="border:1px solid #cccccc; padding: 3px; background-color:#f9f9f9; width: 482px;">http://xs68.xs.to/pics/06075/worf-shadow-subs-split.png</div></div>
<div style="width: auto; overflow: hidden;"><div style="border:1px solid #cccccc; padding: 3px; background-color:#f9f9f9; width: 482px;">http://xs68.xs.to/pics/06075/worf-shadow-subs-split.png</div></div>
And I haveto say that worf's is the most intuitive of them. Basically the every single file in the DB, would in and of themselves actually be shadow-files, having the ability to have sub-files and/or parent-files. Note that I use plural here - restricting parent- and sub-files to only one per file would be bad. RAWs would only be able to have one single subtitle file, while in actuality, there are lots of RAWs that have more than one version of a subtitle file, and also, subtitle files would only be able to be associated with one single RAW, while they usually work with mare than one (not to mention the "separate subtitles for many episodes" case). Note also that if ordinary files were in fact shadow-files, this would make the extra abstraction layer found in this:
And I haveto say that worf's is the most intuitive of them. Basically every single file in the DB, would in and of themselves actually be shadow-files, having the ability to have sub-files and/or parent-files. Note that I use plural here - restricting parent- and sub-files to only one per file would be bad. RAWs would only be able to have one single subtitle file, while in actuality, there are lots of RAWs that have more than one version of a subtitle file, and also, subtitle files would only be able to be associated with one single RAW, while they usually work with more than one (not to mention the "separate subtitles for many episodes" case (see below)). Note also that if ordinary files were in fact shadow-files, this would make the extra abstraction layer found in this:
<div style="width: auto; overflow: hidden;"><div style="border:1px solid #cccccc; padding: 3px; background-color:#f9f9f9; width: 304px;">[[Image:Shadow-normal.png|none]]</div></div>
<div style="width: auto; overflow: hidden;"><div style="border:1px solid #cccccc; padding: 3px; background-color:#f9f9f9; width: 304px;">[[Image:Shadow-normal.png|none]]</div></div>
be unnecessary.
be unnecessary.
Line 30: Line 30:
Still, when it comes to split-episodes the "original" verision of the shadow-files is necessary - you need the abstraction layer there.
Still, when it comes to split-episodes the "original" verision of the shadow-files is necessary - you need the abstraction layer there.
</div>
</div>
I wasn't exactly sure where to put this discussion, but I figured this would be the best place for it. Maybe I should have posted to forum or something instead, but imo, the wiki works better for this.
:I wasn't exactly sure where to put this discussion, but I figured this would be the best place for it. Maybe I should have posted to forum or something instead, but imo, the wiki works better for this.
<span style="float: right;">[[User:Suppy|Suppy]] 03:17, 17 February 2006 (CET)</span>
<span style="float: right;">[[User:Suppy|Suppy]] 03:17, 17 February 2006 (CET)</span>
415

edits

MediaWiki spam blocked by CleanTalk.
MediaWiki spam blocked by CleanTalk.