415
edits
Files:Lame files: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{TOCright}} | ||
Lame files are files without an [[AniDB:Ed2k-hash|ed2k-link]]. | ==What are lame files?== | ||
Lame files are first and foremost files without an '''[[AniDB:Ed2k-hash|ed2k-link]]'''. AniDB uses the ed2k-link to identify a file, and thus, files without ed2k link are a real hassle. | |||
===ed2k-link=== | |||
There can be a few other reason for lame files, but '''the ed2k-link is the most important one'''. | |||
Other, less serious reasons, for lame files are when other parts of the fileentry aren't specified. | |||
===CRC not verified=== | |||
When things like the CRC hasn't been verified, this is considered a lame file - note that even files where the crc is invalid aren't referred to as lame files, since the official crc has been looked up and noted to not match. Files with invalid CRC should only be added if you have reason to believe the corrupt file is widespread. If you're unsure about the CRC, leave it as it is, or try to find out if it is correct on sites like [http://www.envirosphere.com/ Envirosphere] or [http://baka-updates.com/ Baka-Updates]. | |||
===No group=== | |||
If the file doesn't have a group added, this is considered a lame file - even though the fact remains that some files aren't worth putting groupnames on, like selfripped and such (though those should generally not be in the DB at all, instead add them to your [[mylist]] as [[Files:Generic files|Generic files]]). | |||
RAWs are also a hot topic of discussion when it comes to this, but generally, if you know who actually encoded the file, put their name as group. Alot of the raw groups don't do this, please help us by telling us [[which raw groups to credit]]. | |||
===No Quality=== | |||
Files that doesn't have a quality-rating, are considered lame, but this is not very serious - the quality-rating is very subjective in any case, and is likely to change as technology develops - 10 years ago, VHS rips were the standard and considered quite good, while nowadays, you usually frown at their quality. And H264 is replacing XviD and DivX, just as RM was replaced by superior AVIs a few years ago. | |||
Another point to be made is that [[Content:Subtitles|subtitle files]] shouldn't have a quality rating added, as they contain no video. | |||
==Solution== | |||
In the case of ed2k-link, if you have the file in question, you could use [[AOM]] to hash the file if you're on windows, or [[WebAOM]] on any OS, then you will haveto add the ed2k-hash to the file by editing it or filing a [[creq]]. | |||
If CRC is not verified, try going to the group's website or IRC channel in order to find out if it has the correct CRC or not, or you can try [http://www.envirosphere.com/ Envirosphere] or [http://baka-updates.com/ Baka-Updates]. | |||
If you don't know the group, you should check first the file - there might be information about the group in the video or subtitle streams. If that fails, you should try to check the place you got it from, if it is an actual person, ask them whose file it is. | |||
In the case of no quality - watch the file, and see what you think. If it is only a subs file, then don't bother. | |||
[[Category:Definitions]] | [[Category:Definitions]] | ||