Review comments: Difference between revisions

*Excellent (10) - A vote of 10 should be reserved for the best of the best -- reviews where you'd say, as one top reviewer put it, "I actually feel guilty for giving a 10 to a different review before this." Use this vote when you feel like saying "wow!" after reading the review. The difference between 8 and 10 is very subjective so use your own good sense. When voting 10, try to express what aspect of the review made you feel inclined to giving it a 10 rather than an 8.

*Good (8) - This is the vote that reviewers should normally be aiming for, and which they should receive if you find their reviews helpful, informative, enjoyable to read, funny, moving, etc. Even when voting 8, it's nice to make a few comments on parts you didn't like, as well as the parts you found especially good, so that the reviewer can keep these in mind when writing more reviews in the future.

*Above average (6) - Vote 6 if the review does the job well, but you still don't find anything particularly good about it. Perhaps it just follows a formula that works, without being fresh and original. The difference between 6 and 8 can often be somewhat subjective, but as always, it's nice to leave constructive comments if possible.

*Meets minimum requirements (5) - Vote 5 if the review has no glaring errors and objectively satisfies the requirements for what a review should do, but otherwise has no good qualities. When voting 5, it is polite to leave comments on how you think the review could be improved. However, the reviewer should not expect you to increase your vote automatically just because improvements are made.

*Needs some revision (3) - Use this vote if the review has some merit, but also serious problems that need to be addressed before the review belongs on AniDB. A vote of 3 should always be accompanied by a list of exactly what aspects you believe need to be corrected in order to meet the minimum requirements.

*Needs complete revision (1) - Reserve this vote for so-called reviews that do not serve the purpose of a review whatsoever. Pure plot synopsis, a few sentences about how the anime being reviewed is the best/worst thing in the world, random banging on the keyboard, plagarism of another reviewer's text, and completely off-topic writing are some examples but not the only ones. In addition, a vote of 1 may be appropriate if the person commenting believes that, aside from extensive problems that would justify a vote of 3, the review has little or no redeeming qualities, such that a total rewrite would be necessary in order to provide a useful review.