9
edits
Talk:Achievements Dev: Difference between revisions
→Anime Classics and/or Genre Packs
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
* I don't approve of achievements based on a list generated by random users, cause that's what we all are. What exactly would this badge represent, that you've watched the selected anime from certain genre, picked by other anime fans. I don't see the point in that. I've also seen the classic anime badge, and isn't it the same thing? Classic by whose definition? Ours? I'd much rather have badges based on (mostly) factual data or based on opinions of something official (the awards given in official events in Japan). --[[User:nwa|nwa]] | * I don't approve of achievements based on a list generated by random users, cause that's what we all are. What exactly would this badge represent, that you've watched the selected anime from certain genre, picked by other anime fans. I don't see the point in that. I've also seen the classic anime badge, and isn't it the same thing? Classic by whose definition? Ours? I'd much rather have badges based on (mostly) factual data or based on opinions of something official (the awards given in official events in Japan). --[[User:nwa|nwa]] | ||
** While I like the general idea of genre badges, I agree with nwa's points. There will be constant complaint about this series not being considered while that one is. The ideal chase would be if the achievement considers all series with max weight of a certain category. | ** While I like the general idea of genre badges, I agree with nwa's points. There will be constant complaint about this series not being considered while that one is. The ideal chase would be if the achievement considers all series with max weight of a certain category.--[[User:BartS|BartS]] | ||
--[[User:BartS|BartS]] | |||