Difference between revisions of "Review guideline"
|Line 73:||Line 73:|
value a has.
Is it a /
you will ?
Revision as of 13:21, 9 May 2006
The following "guide" should not be treated as the official AniDB way to review anime. The following are suggested guidelines to help beginning reviewers structure and give them points of interest to comment on. This is not a manual. Writing takes creativity, and a reviewer’s style and structure varies from one person to another. The following guidelines are what I personally try to follow, and I believe it is a fair way to review. This guide is meant for potential reviewers that want to receive an in-depth opinion on writing effective reviews at AniDB. However, I am confident that if you are taking the time to read this guide, you must be interested in furthering the quality of your reviews. I hope you enjoy my "guide".
Many reviewers at AniDB prefer to divide their reviews into the follow sections: Animation, Sound, Story, Character, Value, and Enjoyment. It is logical, and by no means a bad way to structure an anime review. Structuring your review into sections allow readers to easily locate information they want instead of searching for it in your review. However, this method of writing restrict may restrict your thought process, explicitly dividing your review into sections. If you choose to not divide your review into such sections, try to at least keep in mind the following guidelines stated later in this guide. Always keep in mind that your review is to help users decide whether or not they want to watch. "Sell" your opinions and ideas. Do not hold back simply because your opinion does not jive with the majority. Perhaps whoever is reading your review may have similar tastes. By not stating your honest opinion, you may adversly affect your credibility in the future.
As you watch more anime, it may be beneficial to reference other anime to help readers see your point of reference. However, do not just simply state that "so and so" anime is just like "this" anime. Justify your comparisons by commenting on what is similar or different. If you can't comment on how the two or more anime are similar/different, you may end up confusing your reader.
Personally, I believe that using emoticons detract from a reviewer's credibility. I treat reviewing as if it were an essay. There are far more creative ways to express your thoughts without using emoticons. However, if you must use them, use them sparingly. Good writing comes from "presenting", "expressing", or "showing" your ideas to your reader. Try to do so by varying your word usage and keep in mind the connotations of your words.
Commenting on Fansub Quality
Commenting on fansub quality is unnecessary because you are reviewing the anime itself, not the fansub. You can comment on a particular fansub's quality by either voting or posting your thoughts on a particular group (see: groupvotes per anime) in the Group Info area. This area can be found for all anime entries. Post your comments on fansub quality there.
Try to keep your review as spoil free as possible. Although it is quite hard to review certain anime without spoiling, try to be as informative, but as unrevealing as possible. Please consider those who have not watched the anime before. By including spoilers you will more than likely hinder his or her viewing experience.
Areas of Potential Commentary
Animation Style and Detail
Many anime have differing animation styles. Here are some points that you may want to comment on:
- Describe the animation style.
- Is the animation realistic or fantasy-like?
- What kind of perspective was the animation done from?
- What do you think the director was trying to achieve with this kind of animation?
- Is the animation style unique, or is the animation style similar to another anime you are familiar with?
- Does the animation style fit the mood of the anime?
- Was this animation style memorable?
- Does the animation use repeating frames? Did this add or detract from your enjoyment?
- How was the animation's fluidity?
- Was it choppy and jittery?
- Did the anime use pan shots?
- Was it used effectively or overused?
- Describe the backgrounds
- How were the backgrounds and inatimate objects drawn?
- If they were detailed, point out certain examples that you could.
- Were they memorable?
- Did they immerse you or had no effect?
- If they weren't detailed much at all, do you think it was done that way on purpose? Or was it meant to be that way?
- Describe the character designs
- Were different character designs important to this anime?
- Did all the character designs they look the same, or did they vary?
- Could you recognize characters easily by say just looking at their soliette?
- If characters looked similar to each other, was it fustrating, or it wasn't important?
- Describe the opening and ending sequence
- Did they fit the anime?
- Was it misleading or memorable?
First off, the seiyuu (voice actors). If one of the voice actors is doing a horrible job since his/her voice doesn`t fit the character at all, now is your chance. Or if someone is doing such a good job that the voice of that person keeps the bad storyline interesting, tell it. Tell why it is a great opening song, like when it fits the series very well, or if it doesn`t fit at all even though it`s a good opening song.
How is the story? Is the plot deep and good enough to make an interesting anime, or is there no plot at all and is it only fighting or fanservice?
Characters are the base of an anime. If they don`t interest you, the anime often fails to be interesting. A few aspects of what you can comment on when it comes to characters:
- Realistic Characters
- Do the characters behave in a realistic way? Can you relate to them or do they do things which are so stupid that it is truly unbelievable?
- Do the characters evolve? Do they undergo a realistic change in behaviour because of specific events happening in the series?
- Are the characters meant to evolve, or is it a comedy where they`re meant to be stereotypes?
- Is there a character which develops him/herself much more or much less than other characters while (s)he doesn`t deserve it?
- Are the characters likeable? A character can be done really well, but can you enjoy seeing that character onscreen or do you despise that character?
- Why does a character deserve to be named specifically? Is it because you enjoyed seeing him/her or was it because of certain actions that character took, or did (s)he undergo a change of behaviour?
There are a few ways of deciding what value a title has. A few aspects you can think of are written below:
- Is it an anime you believe you can watch a second time, or perhaps more often, over time?
- Is it an anime you could watch all over again, or are there only a few episodes/scenes worth rewatching?
- Sometimes an anime is good, but after having seen the first time, the second time doesn`t have to offer anything because you already know the culprit, or the secret and that was what it was all about.
- Even though you didn`t like the show, do you think others who did like the show believe it is worth rewatching it?
- Sentimental Value
- Would you like to keep this anime around, even though you might not rewatch it?
- Would you (eventually) buy this anime, or do you consider buying it?
- Is it something you would like to have in a collection?
- Is this an anime you will remember for a long, long time and will still be talking vividly about even after years have passed?
This is easy. How much did you enjoy this series/movie? Tell us what you particularly liked and disliked (try not to spoil though).