Talk:AniDB Definition:Romanisation: Difference between revisions

Talk:AniDB Definition:Romanisation (view source)

979 bytes added , 4 December 2005

no edit summary

476

edits

Revision as of 13:43, 4 December 2005 (view source) Jfs (talk \| contribs) (Why romanisation should not be a partial translation) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:05, 4 December 2005 (view source) Rar (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 50:		Line 50:

	-- [[User:Jfs\|Jfs]] 14:43, 4 December 2005 (CET)		-- [[User:Jfs\|Jfs]] 14:43, 4 December 2005 (CET)

			:Hmm... what's your battle here? The wasei eigo section has quite clearly not been written yet, nor, as far as I can see, does anything say anidb transcriptions should use Hepburn. I know the site has (Romaji, Hepburn) under title when adding anime, but hey, the site has lots of things that aren't really right. Anyway, unless you are implying above that you want all transcriptions to strickly follow the japanese spelling (which would be silly - better to write them in hiragana in that case and auto-romanise according to style preference on display), I suggest you take advantage of the wikiness. Hit [http://www.anidb.net/wiki/index.php?title=AniDB_Definition:Romanisation&action=edit&section=17 edit] and get writing the ''Directly transcribe wasei eigo terms from their kana spelling'' side of the debate, use what you've written above as the basis for some bullet points and you've practically done all the work already. --[[User:Rar\|Rar]] 00:05, 5 December 2005 (CET)