staff
236
edits
Talk:Achievements Dev/Archive: Difference between revisions
Talk:Achievements Dev/Archive (view source)
Revision as of 08:31, 17 February 2012
, 17 February 2012SEVERAL replies on →Open ideas / comments
(Reply to →nwa's grim outlook) |
(SEVERAL replies on →Open ideas / comments) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Adding and ranking anime/character tags --unknown author | * Adding and ranking anime/character tags --unknown author | ||
** I don't like this idea. Too many crappy tags already. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 09:31, 17 February 2012 (CET) | |||
* Number of anime watched before the birthdate of the user --unknown author | * Number of anime watched before the birthdate of the user --unknown author | ||
* Number of anime watched from the childhood of the user (4-16 years since birthdate) --unknown author | * Number of anime watched from the childhood of the user (4-16 years since birthdate) --unknown author | ||
** I frankly think those two are rather bad, as this is inherently biased (yearly production varies; a 30 year old user and a 16 year old one will have wildly different amounts to watch...). In addition, privacy-concerned users will have one less badge to show off, as many avoid putting their birth date. You won't find mine on AniDB. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 09:31, 17 February 2012 (CET) | |||
* Adding lexicon articles --unknown author | * Adding lexicon articles --unknown author | ||
** Though DerIdiot is trying to work on some new better version of categories/tags/lexicon; may thus be redundant at some point in time? --[[User:Shitenshi|Shitenshi]] 18:55, 18 January 2012 (CET) | ** Though DerIdiot is trying to work on some new better version of categories/tags/lexicon; may thus be redundant at some point in time? --[[User:Shitenshi|Shitenshi]] 18:55, 18 January 2012 (CET) | ||
*** In that case, we might put this idea on hold until the idea of how a new system would be takes shape. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 02:46, 19 January 2012 (CET) | *** In that case, we might put this idea on hold until the idea of how a new system would be takes shape. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 02:46, 19 January 2012 (CET) | ||
*** Ok, I was thinking about this, and I ''really'' think the way Lexicon works now is mostly ok. While yes, the cat/tag/ctag/crtag system needs to change, I think Lexicon itself is ok. Lexicon entries are quite well-moderated (requiring add creqs and stuff), they need the user to actually work (while not requiring them to know japanese or any such difficulties related to adding creators, adding anime, etc; just some common sense and a brain should generally suffice), and, most importantly, they help create higher quality tags by promoting integration, etc, not to mention the pic. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 09:31, 17 February 2012 (CET) | |||
* Converted credits --unknown author | * Converted credits --unknown author | ||
** Can someone explain to me what this is? | |||
* [http://anidb.net/tag111 World Masterpiece Theater] series anime watched --unknown author | * [http://anidb.net/tag111 World Masterpiece Theater] series anime watched --unknown author | ||
** I like this one a lot. They're not linked closely like other creator/show badges, but it makes sense because the brand name has its own touch and is generally based off classic literature. Culture never hurts. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 02:46, 19 January 2012 (CET) | ** I like this one a lot. They're not linked closely like other creator/show badges, but it makes sense because the brand name has its own touch and is generally based off classic literature. Culture never hurts. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 02:46, 19 January 2012 (CET) | ||
| Line 22: | Line 26: | ||
** On second thought, maybe I don't like it as much. Community awards are often given to mediocre and overrated shows. It doesn't make sense to give awards to Top 10 shows. What remains are things like the Mainichi Awards, which isn't that relevant for western viewers. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 02:56, 19 January 2012 (CET) | ** On second thought, maybe I don't like it as much. Community awards are often given to mediocre and overrated shows. It doesn't make sense to give awards to Top 10 shows. What remains are things like the Mainichi Awards, which isn't that relevant for western viewers. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 02:56, 19 January 2012 (CET) | ||
*** I'm not that familiar with the awards myself, but why would the Mainichi awards not be relevant? Not all anime categories/creator categories are relevant for everyone either; it's just a way to grouop anime? --[[User:Shitenshi|Shitenshi]] 08:13, 19 January 2012 (CET) | *** I'm not that familiar with the awards myself, but why would the Mainichi awards not be relevant? Not all anime categories/creator categories are relevant for everyone either; it's just a way to grouop anime? --[[User:Shitenshi|Shitenshi]] 08:13, 19 January 2012 (CET) | ||
**** The idea is that the Mainichi awards and similar are fairly obscure on this side of the Europe-Asia division (or, alternatively, this side of the Pacific -- whichever works best for you). Of course, I have nothing ''against'' adding them; I just wonder about their actual usefulness. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 09:31, 17 February 2012 (CET) | |||
*** This would only be good if we'd have official awards present (like Mainichi, but I don't even know if that one is up to date), for ARC awards I'd have to say no. --[[User:Nwa|Nwa]] 21:28, 21 January 2012 (CET) | *** This would only be good if we'd have official awards present (like Mainichi, but I don't even know if that one is up to date), for ARC awards I'd have to say no. --[[User:Nwa|Nwa]] 21:28, 21 January 2012 (CET) | ||
**** I've added the missing Mainichi Awards a few days ago --[[User:Worf|Worf]] 23:00, 21 January 2012 (CET) | **** I've added the missing Mainichi Awards a few days ago --[[User:Worf|Worf]] 23:00, 21 January 2012 (CET) | ||
| Line 28: | Line 33: | ||
*** Only a select number of people add staff. "ads" should've been adds indeed, sorry. There should be very few/none anime staff add/edit creqs as anyone working on them almost automatically gets the needed rights. Otherwise, creqs would be created in mass volumes... --[[User:Shitenshi|Shitenshi]] 08:13, 19 January 2012 (CET) | *** Only a select number of people add staff. "ads" should've been adds indeed, sorry. There should be very few/none anime staff add/edit creqs as anyone working on them almost automatically gets the needed rights. Otherwise, creqs would be created in mass volumes... --[[User:Shitenshi|Shitenshi]] 08:13, 19 January 2012 (CET) | ||
* "Category" based badges (where the max level is a certain % seen of all animes with that category). --Arcturon&Msr on IRC | * "Category" based badges (where the max level is a certain % seen of all animes with that category). --Arcturon&Msr on IRC | ||
** We already have this for porn, which at the end of the day is a category, so why the hell not. --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 09:31, 17 February 2012 (CET) | |||
* Staff's selection badges (each mod personally picks ~10 anime which are grouped for his personal selection badge). --Arcturon on IRC | * Staff's selection badges (each mod personally picks ~10 anime which are grouped for his personal selection badge). --Arcturon on IRC | ||
** I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on nwa's considerations on this matter (ctrl+f grim outlook). --[[User:Hinoe|Hinoe]] 09:31, 17 February 2012 (CET) | |||
= Accepted ideas = | = Accepted ideas = | ||