Talk:Achievements Dev/Archive: Difference between revisions

Talk:Achievements Dev/Archive (view source)

131 bytes added , 17 February 2012

staff

236

edits

Revision as of 10:02, 23 January 2012 (view source) Nwa (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:03, 17 February 2012 (view source) Hinoe (talk \| contribs) (Reply to →‎nwa's grim outlook) Newer edit →
Line 472:		Line 472:

	I don't approve of achievements based on a list generated by random users, cause that's what we all are. What exactly would this badge represent, that you've watched the selected anime from certain genre, picked by other anime fans. I don't see the point in that. I've also seen the classic anime badge, and isn't it the same thing? Classic by whose definition? Ours? I'd much rather have badges based on (mostly) factual data or based on opinions of something official (the awards given in official events in Japan).		I don't approve of achievements based on a list generated by random users, cause that's what we all are. What exactly would this badge represent, that you've watched the selected anime from certain genre, picked by other anime fans. I don't see the point in that. I've also seen the classic anime badge, and isn't it the same thing? Classic by whose definition? Ours? I'd much rather have badges based on (mostly) factual data or based on opinions of something official (the awards given in official events in Japan).
			* That's a fairly good point. I'd like to hear everyone else's opinion on it. --[[User:Hinoe\|Hinoe]] 09:03, 17 February 2012 (CET)