AniDB talk:Markup DEV

This page exists to discuss possible changes to the AniDB.net HTML markup

Inconsistencies are bolded

missing stuff is italicized

New

Anime list

• table.anime_list td.rating.[vote|tmp|review] span.count

Latest Additions

• table.seq tr.[yes|no] td.[yes|no] (for VV)

Also noticed a bunch of [td|tr].anime.anime :x

• table.groups td.rating span.count
• div.latest_reviews_list td.vote.[ |anime|review].[high|mid|low] span.count
• div.latest_reviews_list td.rating.[anime|review] span.count
• table.hotanimes td.tmprating.[high|mid|low] span.count

Group List

• table.group_list td.rating.[high|mid|low] span.count

MyList

• table.animelist table.eplist select
  • still has pre-1.36 options

Done in 0.1.36

Main page news items

I would like to see the news items be grouped separately, so instead of

<h4 /> <span.stamp /> <div>text</div> <h4 /> <span.stamp /> <div>text</div> ...

we would have

<div> <h4 /> <span.stamp /> text </div> <div> <h4 /> <span.stamp /> text </div> ...

i would like that too. i also want it to be a generic solution so it'll apply to animegroup and review comments too. g_timedentry or something --Epoximator 18:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

MyNotifies

• div.mynotifies_all div.list table
  • td[.name]
  • td[.new | .complete | .group | .all]
  • td[.date]

--Zak 03:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

My Place

• div.latest_votes li
  • span[.high | .low]
• div.latest_reviews li
  • span[.high | .low]
• div.latest_files li
  • <span.date />

--Zak 03:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

MyDbEntries (pages that contain Lameness)

• div.mydb_all

current situation:

all contain one that is of the classes 'text' & 'lame' the lame entries' are of the class 'lame' too the problem with that is, that by using the selector #layout-content div.mydb_all tr.lame all are affected (checked with firefox&opera)

• div.mydb_all table.mydb_animetitle
  • tr[.verified]
  • td.verified[.yes | .no]

Messages

• div.msg_all
  • ul has no class
    • li[.g_odd]

--Zeromind 01:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Anime Reviews

• div.review [.approved | .unrated | .disapproved] not assigned properly (e.g. 'unrated' for a review with 22votes & rating >8) - in the text the states are correct

--Zeromind 21:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)