Categories:Content Indicators: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{cat-nav|Content Indicators}} | {{cat-nav|Content Indicators}} | ||
{{TOCright}} | {{TOCright}} | ||
{{CatWeightInfo|worstcaseSec| | {{CatWeightInfo|worstcaseSec|left}} | ||
The ''content indicators'' branch is intended to be a less geographically specific tool than the 'age rating' used by convention, for warning about things that might cause offence. Obviously there is still a degree of subjectivity involved, but hopefully it will prove useful for parents with delicate children, or children with delicate parents. | The ''content indicators'' branch is intended to be a less geographically specific tool than the 'age rating' used by convention, for warning about things that might cause offence. Obviously there is still a degree of subjectivity involved, but hopefully it will prove useful for parents with delicate children, or children with delicate parents. | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 2 May 2009
| ||||
The content indicators branch is intended to be a less geographically specific tool than the 'age rating' used by convention, for warning about things that might cause offence. Obviously there is still a degree of subjectivity involved, but hopefully it will prove useful for parents with delicate children, or children with delicate parents.
Subcategories
Nudity
Are naked humans shown?
+ for an ankle, *** if you glimpse a garter... er... I guess stuff changes with times. Nipples seem to be a particular issue at the moment in certain parts. Anyway, censor with a + for some nude transformation, chuck *+ for shower with OMG, nipples, and go all the way to *** for close up genitals of either gender, even if covered by a jew or pixeled out in a particular release.
Sex
Is there sex?
If it's off-screen or 'implied' give +, and ascend to outright porn at ***.
Violence
Is violence prevalent?
For just a bit of slapstick throw a +, for popping eyeballs and close up disembowelment bestow ***.