9
edits
Talk:Review guideline: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Ran88dom99 (talk | contribs) (New page: Separating a review into Animation, Sound, Story, Character is a bad idea. There are 5 reasons to switch to a good / bad points structure and/or an elements structure. Btw current structur...) |
Ran88dom99 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
1. Easier to find what I am looking for in the review. 2. Easier to see if anime has those elements. | 1. Easier to find what I am looking for in the review. 2. Easier to see if anime has those elements. | ||
The current structure uses categories instead of trying to get the reviewer to write concrete points. | The current structure uses categories instead of trying to get the reviewer to write concrete points. Compare the good/bad points structure or the common reasoning and writing tool, the outline: The question "is this anime good or bad and what do i rate it" or "are the fight scenes good" are answered by answering simpler questions such as "did the story contradict itself often?" or "did the fight seem serious and real enough" and so on. Actually, the average reviewer watches the anime first and then tries to explain or justify their reaction. Also every question is separated into so many smaller questions that mostly are ignored. So instead of "did the fight seem real enough" the reviewer writes and leaves in this structure: "the fights seemed serious." Fights +10 (of these 3 are from point 1) | ||
1. The fight seemed serious +3 | 1. The fight seemed serious +3 | ||