Talk:UDP API Definition: Difference between revisions

From AniDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
Regarding the API errors (in [[UDP_API_Definition#General]]), should 602 (server busy) also be forwarded to epoximator? The note below states all but 601 should be reported, but this seems awkward. Cheers, [[User:Bjecas|Bjecas]] 03:41, 2 September 2008 (CEST)
Regarding the API errors (in [[UDP_API_Definition#General]]), should 602 (server busy) also be forwarded to epoximator? The note below states all but 601 should be reported, but this seems awkward. Cheers, [[User:Bjecas|Bjecas]] 03:41, 2 September 2008 (CEST)


There are logistical challenges forwarding bugs to epoximator, please send them to me instead (via the tracker, ideally).  I'm not especially interested in 602 if it is (very) infrequent, but would be concerned if it is being seen too often, as it might be a symptom of something else wrong.  --[[User:Ommina|Ommina]] 04:06, 2 September 2008 (CEST)
: There are logistical challenges forwarding bugs to epoximator, please send them to me instead (via the tracker, ideally).  I'm not especially interested in 602 if it is (very) infrequent, but would be concerned if it is being seen too often, as it might be a symptom of something else wrong.  --[[User:Ommina|Ommina]] 04:06, 2 September 2008 (CEST)

Revision as of 02:07, 2 September 2008

Error 602 - Reporting?

Regarding the API errors (in UDP_API_Definition#General), should 602 (server busy) also be forwarded to epoximator? The note below states all but 601 should be reported, but this seems awkward. Cheers, Bjecas 03:41, 2 September 2008 (CEST)

There are logistical challenges forwarding bugs to epoximator, please send them to me instead (via the tracker, ideally). I'm not especially interested in 602 if it is (very) infrequent, but would be concerned if it is being seen too often, as it might be a symptom of something else wrong. --Ommina 04:06, 2 September 2008 (CEST)